Look out for useful terminology/neologisms below: pre-awareness and tentpoles and tadpoles
 |
| $101m global box office, $21m budget (1993) |
A few useful nuggests from
this article by Phil Hoad, which highlights and critiques some of the points raised by one-time Hollywood hit producer Lynda Orbst in her bio (given an excoriating review by an unimpressed David Thomson,
here), but the really important point concerns WHY Hollywood has turned to tentpole CGI/SFX spectaculars, usually within franchises and/or using 'pre-known' brands/books.
Her line of attack, that Hollywood has wrongly turned its back on medium budget concept movies, where the script, not CGI, is king, is a common one - especially from industry veterans...
If it wasn't startling enough when, in 2011, Universal president Ron Meyer commented on the amount of "shitty movies" on his own slate, founding fathers Steven Spielberg and George Lucas stepped up in the same week as Obst's book was published to denounce Hollywood's blockbuster dependency. ... The reckoning – led by baby boomers attacking the recent homogenisation
drive in mainstream films – has exposed a generation gap in Hollywood.
Digitisation emerges as one key cause in this shift:
the shrinking of DVD revenue in the mid-noughties halved the studios' profit margins and reduced their appetite for risk